Subject: FZ Bible - Level 4 Coursepack [6/7] Repost [x2]
Date: 26 Nov 1999 23:21:04 -0000
From: squirrel@echelon.alias.net (The Tech Lion)
Organization: FreeZone Bible Association
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

Academy Level IV Coursepack: Part 6 of 7

***************************************

Thanksgiving time is here.

We at FZ Bible Association would like to give thanks to Ron for
leaving us a bounty of Tech.

And celebrate by disseminating it freely to all.

In that spirit we bring you the Level 4 coursepack, from the
late 80's.

Happy Turkey Day,

-Tech Lion

********************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

************************

PART 6

28. HCOB   22 July 1963      You Can Be Right

29. HCOB    1 Sept 1963      Routine Three SC

30. HCOB    5 Sept 1978      Anatomy of a Service Facsimile

31. HCOB    6 Sept 1978 II   Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams

32. HCOB    6 Sept 1978 III  Routine Three SC-A
                             Full Service Facsimile Handling
                             Updated with New Era Dianetics

******************************************************************

28. HCOB   22 July 1963      You Can Be Right

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

       HCO BULLETIN OF 22 JULY 1963

MA
Franchise
BPI

            YOU CAN BE RIGHT

Rightness and wrongness form a common source of argument and
struggle.

The concept of rightness reaches very high and very low on the
Tone Scale.

And the effort to be right is the last conscious striving of an
individual on the way out. I-am-right-and-they-are-wrong is the
lowest concept that can be formulated by an unaware case.

What is right and what is wrong are not necessarily definable for
everyone. These vary according to existing moral codes and
disciplines and, before Scientology, despite their use in law as
a test of "sanity," had no basis in fact but only in opinion.

In Dianetics and Scientology a more precise definition arose. And
the definition became as well the true definition of an overt
act. An overt act is not just injuring someone or something: an
overt act is an act of omission or commission which does the
least good for the least number of dynamics or the most harm to
the greatest number of dynamics. (See the eight dynamics.)

Thus, a wrong action is wrong to the degree that it harms the
greatest number of dynamics. And a right action is right to the
degree that it benefits the greatest number of dynamics.

Many people think that an action is an overt simply because it is
destructive. To them all destructive actions or omissions are
overt acts. This is not true. For an act of commission or
omission to be an overt act it must harm the greater number of
dynamics. A failure to destroy can be, therefore, an overt act.
Assistance to something that would harm a greater number of
dynamics can also be an overt act.

An overt act is something that harms broadly. A beneficial act is
something that helps broadly. It can be a beneficial act to harm
something that would be harmful to the greater number of
dynamics.

Harming everything and helping everything alike can be overt
acts. Helping certain things and harming certain things alike can
be beneficial acts.

The idea of not harming anything and helping everything are alike
rather mad. It is doubtful if you would think helping enslavers
was a beneficial action and equally doubtful if you would
consider the destruction of a disease an overt act.

In the matter of being right or being wrong, a lot of muddy
thinking can develop. There are no absolute rights or absolute
wrongs. And being right does not consist of being unwilling to
harm and being wrong does not consist only of not harming.

There is an irrationality about "being right" which not only
throws out the validity of the legal test of sanity but also
explains why some people do very wrong things and insist they are
doing right.

The answer lies in an impulse, inborn in everyone, to try to be
right. This is an insistence which rapidly becomes divorced from
right action. And it is accompanied by an effort to make others
wrong, as we see in hypercritical cases. A being who is
apparently unconscious is still being right and making others
wrong. It is the last criticism.

We have seen a "defensive person" explaining away the most
flagrant wrongnesses. This is "justification" as well. Most
explanations of conduct, no matter how far-fetched, seem
perfectly right to the person making them since he or she is only
asserting self-rightness and other-wrongness.

We have long said that that which is not admired tends to
persist. If no one admires a person for being right, then that
person's "brand of being right" will persist, no matter how mad
it sounds. Scientists who are aberrated cannot seem to get many
theories. They do not because they are more interested in
insisting on their own odd rightnesses than they are in finding
truth. Thus, we get strange "scientific truths" from men who
should know better, including the late Einstein. Truth is built
by those who have the breadth and balance to see also where
they're wrong.

You have heard some very absurd arguments out among the crowd.
Realize that the speaker was more interested in asserting his or
her own rightness than in being right.

A thetan tries to be right and fights being wrong. This is
without regard to being right about something or to do actual
right. It is an insistence which has no concern with a rightness
of conduct.

One tries to be right always, right down to the last spark.

How, then, is one ever wrong?

It is this way:

One does a wrong action, accidentally or through oversight. The
wrongness of the action or inaction is then in conflict with
one's necessity to be right. So one then may continue and repeat
the wrong action to prove it is right.

This is a fundamental of aberration. All wrong actions are the
result of an error followed by an insistence on having been
right. Instead of righting the error (which would involve being
wrong) one insists the error was a right action and so repeats
it.

As a being goes down scale, it is harder and harder to admit
having been wrong. Nay, such an admission could well be
disastrous to any remaining ability or sanity.

For rightness is the stuff of which survival is made. And as one
approaches the last ebb of survival, one can only insist on
having been right, for to believe for a moment one has been wrong
is to court oblivion.

The last defense of any being is "I was right." That applies to
anyone. When that defense crumbles, the lights go out.

So we are faced with the unlovely picture of asserted rightness
in the face of flagrant wrongness. And any success in making the
being realize their wrongness results in an immediate
degradation, unconsciousness or, at best, a loss of personality.
Pavlov, Freud, psychiatry alike never grasped the delicacy of
these facts and so evaluated and punished the criminal and insane
into further criminality and insanity.

All justice today contains in it this hidden error -- that the
last defense is a belief in personal rightness regardless of
charges and evidence alike, and that the effort to make another
wrong results only in degradation.

But all this would be a hopeless impasse leading to highly
chaotic social conditions were it not for one saving fact:

All repeated and "incurable" wrongnesses stem from the exercise
of a last defense: "trying to be right." Therefore, the
compulsive wrongness can be cured no matter how mad it may seem
or how thoroughly its rightness is insisted upon.

Getting the offender to admit his or her wrongness is to court
further degradation and even unconsciousness or the destruction
of a being. Therefore, the purpose of punishment is defeated and
punishment has minimal workability.

But by getting the offender off the compulsive repetition of the
wrongness, one then cures it.

But how?

By rehabilitating the ability to be right!

This has limitless application -- in training, in social skills,
in marriage, in law, in life.

Example: A wife is always burning dinner. Despite scolding,
threats of divorce, anything, the compulsion continues. One can
wipe this wrongness out by getting her to explain what is right
about her cooking. This may well evoke a raging tirade in some
extreme cases, but if one flattens the question, that all dies
away and she happily ceases to burn dinners. Carried to classic
proportions but not entirely necessary to end the compulsion, a
moment in the past will be recovered when she accidentally burned
a dinner and could not face up to having done a wrong action. To
be right she thereafter had to burn dinners.

Go into a prison and find one sane prisoner who says he did
wrong. You won't find one. Only the broken wrecks will say so out
of terror of being hurt. But even they don't believe they did
wrong.

A judge on a bench, sentencing criminals, would be given pause to
realize that not one malefactor sentenced really thought he had
done wrong and will never believe it in fact, though he may seek
to avert wrath by saying so.

The do-gooder crashes into this continually and is given his
loses by it.

But marriage, law and crime do not constitute all the spheres of
living where this applies. These facts embrace all of life.

The student who can't learn, the worker who can't work, the boss
who can't boss are all caught on one side of the right-wrong
question. They are being completely one-sided. They are being
"last-ditch-right." And opposing them, those who would teach
them are fixed on the other side, "admit-you-are-wrong." And out
of this we get not only no-change but actual degradation where it
"wins." But there are no wins in this imbalance, only loses for
both.

Thetans on the way down don't believe they are wrong because they
don't dare believe it. And so they do not change.

Many a preclear in processing is only trying to prove himself
right and the auditor wrong, particularly the lower case levels,
and so we sometimes get no-change sessions.

And those who won't be audited at all are totally fixed on
asserted rightness and are so close to gone that any question of
their past rightness would, they feel, destroy them.

I get my share of this when a being, close to extinction, and
holding contrary views, grasps for a moment the rightness of
Scientology and then in sudden defense asserts his own
"rightnesses," sometimes close to terror.

It would be a grave error to go on letting an abuser of
Scientology abuse. The route is to get him or her to explain how
right he or she is without explaining how wrong Scientology is,
for to do the last is to let them commit a serious overt. "What
is right about your mind" would produce more case change and win
more friends than any amount of evaluation or punishment to make
them wrong.

You can be right. How? By getting another to explain how he or
she is right -- until he or she, being less defensive now, can
take a less compulsive point of view. You don't have to agree
with what they think. You only have to acknowledge what they say.
And suddenly they can be right.

A lot of things can be done by understanding and using this
mechanism. It will take, however, some study of this article
before it can be gracefully applied -- for all of us are reactive
to some degree on this subject. And those who sought to enslave
us did not neglect to install a right-wrong pair of items on the
far backtrack. But these won't really get in your way.

As Scientologists, we are faced by a frightened society who think
they would be wrong if we were found to be right. We need a
weapon to correct this. We have one here.

And you can be right, you know. I was probably the first to
believe you were, mechanism or no mechanism. The road to
rightness is the road to survival. And every person is somewhere
on that scale.

You can make yourself right, amongst other ways, by making others
right enough to afford to change their minds. Then a lot more of
us will arrive.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

(Note: This is the first in a series of HCO Bulletins designed
for publication in continental magazines. I am developing a whole
presentation of Scientology at this level for general use in
life. Follow this HCO Bulletin with the next in magazines.)

LRH:gl.jh.cden.gm



******************************************************************

29. HCOB    1 Sept 1963      Routine Three SC

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 1 SEPTEMBER 1963

Central Orgs
Franchise

            SCIENTOLOGY THREE
      CLEARING--CLEARING--CLEARING

            ROUTINE THREE SC

There has been such a rush on in technical that it may have
looked to you that we were in a state of rapid change. This was
occasioned by a speed-up caused by various events. You are
getting about a century of research (or more) in a very few
months. So bear with me. The end is not only in sight. It's here.
My job is mainly now to refine and get the data to you.

The order brought into our work by making FIVE LEVELS OF
SCIENTOLOGY is paying off rapidly. Level One is in development.
Level Two is well away. Level Four is complete. And suddenly
Level Three leaped to a final phase.

We can CLEAR, CLEAR, CLEAR.

This has been a stepchild for months, even years now. It has been
mauled, messed up, invalidated and rehabilitated and knocked
around. But a BOOK ONE CLEAR was what most people came into
Scientology to obtain. And now I've done it. I've found out why
not and how.

And this HCO Bulletin is a hurry-skurry outline of the steps so
you can do it. There will be lots of HCO Bulletins on this. The
tapes of 27, 28 and 29 Aug. 63, give most of its theory.

CLEAR DEFINED -- Book One definition holds exactly true. A Clear
is somebody with no "held down fives" in this lifetime (see
Dianetics: The Evolution of a Science).

CLEAR TEST -- Clear sits at Clear read on the TA with a free
needle. No natter. No upsets. No whole track keyed in. No SERVICE
FACSIMILE.

CLEAR STABILITY -- We are not concerned with stability. But we
can now key out so thoroughly that we need not stress "Keyed-Out
Clear." I have found the means, I am sure, to make this state far
more stable and recreate it easily if it slips.

So forgive me for being indecisive about Clear states for these
past many months.

The breakthrough is stated as follows: IF YOU CANNOT MAKE A CLEAR
IN A 25-HOUR PREPCHECK, THE PC HAS ONE OR MORE SERVICE
FACSIMILES.

The barrier to clearing and the reason for fast relapse when
Clear was attained has been the SERVICE FACSIMILE.

SERVICE FACSIMILE defined: Advanced Procedure and Axioms
definition accurate. Added to this is THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS
THAT COMPUTATION GENERATED BY THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO MAKE
SELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG, TO DOMINATE OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND
ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS.

Note that it is generated by the pc, not the bank. Thus, the pc
restimulates the bank with the computation; the bank, unlike
going to OT, does not retard the pc in this instance.

The service facsimile is usually a this-lifetime effort only. It
might better be called a SERVICE COMPUTATION but we'll hold to
our old terms. The pc is doing it. In usual aberration the bank
is doing it (the pc's engrams, etc.). Where you can't clear the
pc by auditing just bank, you have to get out of the road what
the pc is doing to stay aberrated. If you clear only what the
bank is doing, the Clear state rapidly relapses. If you clear
what the pc is doing, the bank tends to stay more quiet and
unrestimulated. It is the pc who mostly keys his bank back in.
Therefore, the pc who won't go free-needle Clear is himself
unconsciously preventing it. And by knocking out this effort we
can then key out the bank and we have a fast Clear who pretty
well stays Clear (until sent on to OT).

The state is desirable to attain as it speeds going to OT.

All this came from studies I've been doing of the tone arm. The
tone arm must move during auditing or the pc gets worse. All
those pcs whose tone arms don't easily get into action and hang
up are SERVICE FACSIMILE pcs.

Note that the SERVICE FACSIMILE is used to:

FIRST:  Make self right
        Make others wrong

SECOND: To avoid domination
        To dominate others

THIRD:  To increase own survival
        To hinder the survival of others.

The service facsimile is all of it logical gobbledegook. It
doesn't make good sense. That's because the pc adopted it where,
in extreme cases, he or she felt endangered by something but
could not itsa it. Hence it's illogical. Because it is senseless,
really, the computation escapes casual inspection and makes for
aberrated behavior.

            TO MAKE A CLEAR

The steps, in brief, are:

1. ESTABLISH SERVICE FAC. This is done by assessment of
Scientology List One of 2-12 and using that for a starter and
then using the Preliminary Step of R3R as published (HCO Bulletin
of 1 July 63). One uses only things found by assessment, never by
wild guesses or pc's obvious disabilities. These assessments
already exist on many cases and should be used as earlier found.

2. AUDIT WITH RIGHT-WRONG. Ask pc, with itsa line carefully in,
FIRST QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (whatever was found)
make you right?" Adjust question until pc can answer it, if pc
can't. Don't force it off on pc. If it's correct, it will run
well. Don't keep repeating the question unless pc needs it. Just
let pc answer and answer and answer. Let pc come to a cognition
or run out of answers or try to answer the next question
prematurely and switch questions to: SECOND QUESTION: "In this
lifetime, how would (whatever was found) make others wrong?"
Treat this the same way. Let the pc come to a cog, or run out of
answers or accidentally start to answer the first question. Go
back to first question. Do the same with it. Then to second
question. Then to first question again, then to second.

If your assessment was right, pc will be getting better and
better TA action. But the TA action will eventually lessen. On
any big cognition, end the process. This may all take from 2
hours to 5, 1 don't think more. The idea is not to beat the
process to death or sink pc into bank GPMs. The pc will have
automaticities (answers coming too fast to be said easily) early
in the run. These must be gone and pc bright when you end. You
are only trying to end the compulsive character of the service
facsimile so found and get it off automatic and get pc to see it
better, not to remove all TA action from the process.

3. AUDIT SECOND PROCESS. Using the same method of auditing as in
(2) above, use the THIRD QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would
(same one used in step 2) help you escape domination?" When this
seems cooled off, use FOURTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how
would (same one) help you dominate others?" Use THIRD QUESTION
and FOURTH QUESTION again and until pc has it all cooled off or a
big cognition.

4. AUDIT THIRD PROCESS. Using the same method as in (2) above,
use the FIFTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime, how would (same one)
aid your survival?" and then SIXTH QUESTION: "In this lifetime,
how would (same one) hinder the survival of others?" Use FIVE and
SIX as long as is necessary to cool it all off or to produce a
big cognition.

5. PREPCHECK WITH BIG MID RUDS, using the question, "In this
lifetime, on (same one) has anything been ______?" and get in
Suppress, Careful of, Failed to reveal, Invalidate, Suggest,
Mistake been made, Protest, Anxious about, Decided.

If the pc has a really shattering cognition, just halt Prepcheck
and end it off.

This Prepcheck is done, of course, off the meter until the pc
says no, then checking it on the meter and cleaning it off. Once
you've gone to meter on a button, stay with meter for further
queries. But don't clean cleans and don't leave slows or speeded
rises either. And don't cut pc's itsa line.

                ----------

That should be the end of a service facsimile. But a pc may have
several, so do it all again through all steps as often as is
needed.

Pcs who have had Scientology List One of R2-12 should be given
these as the first things used. Pcs who have had assessments done
for R3R chains should have these assessment results used (or as
much of them as apply) for the next runs. Even if the chain
assessment has been run on R3R still use it for R3SC.

                ----------

            COMPLETING CLEARING

To complete clearing, then, it is only necessary to give a
permissive In This Lifetime 18-button Prepcheck making the pc
look hard for answers, short of ARC breaking pc.

And you should have a beautiful free needle and TA at the Clear
read and the pc shining.

                ----------

If clearing did not occur, these following faults were present in
the auditing:

1. Pc did not agree with assessment, it read only because pc did
not understand it or protested it.

2. The assessment was wrong.

3. The atmosphere of auditing was critical of pc.

4. The itsa line was not in.

5. The auditor let the itsa line wander to early track.

6. The auditor Q-and-Aed and went off process and into engrams on
pc's "sell."

7. The process was not done.

8. The assessment was done by physical disability inspection or
by choosing pc's habits, not by actual assessment.

9. The auditing did not produce TA action (wrong assessment
and/or itsa line out would be all that could produce no TA
action).

10. Pc already sitting in a heavy ARC break by reason of whole-
track bypassed charge.

11. This process used instead of an ARC break assessment well
done, thus making this process a punishment.

12. Questions phrased wrong.

13. Questions were overrun.

14. Questions were underrun.

15. Auditor too choppy on Prepchecking.

16. ARC breaks in these sessions were not cleaned up.

17. Pc trying to plunge into early track and stay restimulated.

18. Pc trying to get early-track GPMs or engrams run to avoid
giving up service facsimile.

19. Auditor missed withholds accumulated during clearing.

20. Process end product "Clear" overestimated by auditor, pc or
Supervisors.

                ----------

The keynote of clearing a service facsimile is INTEREST. If pc
isn't interested in it, the assessment is wrong.

The keynote of auditing tone is permissive, happy, easy, not
militant. Let pc run on and on.

On phrasing question, no matter what is assessed it is always IT
MAKES PC RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG. Pc is not trying to make it
wrong.

                ----------

An ordinary Prepcheck, done with a service facsimile present,
will turn on mass on the pc. Why? Pc is asserting service
facsimile.

                ----------

Well, that's the fast rundown on R3SC (Routine Three, Service
Facsimile Clear). And that's clearing. A lot of theory is missing
in this HCO Bulletin but not one essential step. You can do it.

If a person is cleared before going on to OT, they make it
hundreds of hours faster!

(NOTE: All OT processes will shortly be released with R4
designations but with little other change.)

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:jw.cden.gm



******************************************************************

30. HCOB    5 Sept 1978      Anatomy of a Service Facsimile

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 5 SEPTEMBER 1978

Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses

       ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE

  Refs:
  HCOB 22 July 63            YOU CAN BE RIGHT
  HCOB  1 Sept 63            ROUTINE THREE SC
  HCOB 23 Aug. 66            SERVICE FACSIMILE
  HCOB 30 Nov. 66            ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE
                             FACSIMILES
  Tape: 6308C27 SH Spec 299  RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS
  Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302  HOW TO FIND A SERVICE
                             FACSIMILE
  Tape: 6309C03 SH Spec 302A R3SC
  Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303  SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
  Tape: 6309C18 SH Spec 308  ST. HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING

FACSIMILE:A mental picture unknowingly created; a copy of the
          physical universe environment, complete with all the
          perceptions, at some time in the past.

SERVICE: A method of providing a person with the use of something;
         the action or result of giving assistance or advantage;
         work done; duty performed.

COMPUTATION: That aberrated evaluation and postulate that one must
             be in a certain state in order to succeed.

SERVICE FACSIMILE: THE SERVICE FACSIMILE IS THAT COMPUTATION
                   GENERATED BY THE PRECLEAR (NOT THE BANK) TO
                   MAKE SELF RIGHT AND OTHERS WRONG: TO DOMINATE
                   OR ESCAPE DOMINATION AND ENHANCE OWN SURVIVAL
                   AND INJURE THAT OF OTHERS.

Note that it is a computation, not a doingness, beingness or
havingness. We could call this a "service computation" but we
will maintain the term we have used to describe this phenomenon
throughout the technology: "service facsimile."

It is a computation that the pc adopted when, in an extreme
situation, he felt endangered by something but could not itsa it.

It is called a service facsimile because he uses it; it is "of
service" to him.

Aberration, anybody's aberration on any subject, has been of some
use to them at some time or other. You can trace it back. It's
been of some use, otherwise they wouldn't keep mocking it up. But
now, if you put it up against survival standards, you'd find it
very nonsurvival.

The pc adopted this because he couldn't stand the confusion in a
situation. So he adopted a safe solution. A safe solution is
always adopted as a retreat from the environmental restimulation.
He adopted a safe solution in that instance and he survived. His
safe solution became his stable datum. He has hung onto it ever
since. It is the computation, the fixed idea, he uses to handle
life, his service facsimile.

     HOW THE SERVICE FACSIMILE BECOMES FIXED

An idea is the thing most easily substituted for a thetan. An
idea doesn't have any mass connected with it basically. And it
appears to have some wisdom in it so it's very easily substituted
for a thetan. Thus, the idea, the stable datum he has adopted, is
substituted for the thetan.

How does this stable datum become so fixed? It gets fixed, and
more and more firmly as time goes on, by the confusion it is
supposed to handle but doesn't.

The stable datum was adopted in lieu of inspection. The person
ceased to inspect, he fell back from inspecting, he fell back
from living. He put the datum there to substitute for his own
observation and his own coping with life, and at that moment he
started an accumulation of confusion.

That which is not confronted and inspected tends to persist.
Thus, in the absence of his own confronting mass collects. The
stable datum forbids inspection. It's an automatic solution. It's
"safe." It solves everything. He no longer has to inspect to
solve, so he never as-ises the mass. He gets caught in the middle
of the mass. And it collects more and more confusion and his
ability to inspect becomes less and less. The more he isn't
confronting, the less he can confront. This becomes a dwindling
spiral.

So the thing he has adopted to handle his environment for him is
the thing which reduces his ability to handle his environment.

Those things which do not respond to routine auditing, that
routine auditing won't change, are rooted in this mechanism.

Therefore, it is important to find the idea on which he is so
fixed. Pull the fixed idea and you free the individual for a
broader perimeter of inspection.

In service fac handling, the reason you get tone arm action when
the fixed idea has been pulled is that the confusion which has
been amassed and dammed up for so long is now running off.

     RIGHT/WRONG, DOMINATE AND SURVIVE

Right and wrong are the tools of survival. In order to survive
you have to be right. There is a level at which true rightness is
analytical, and there is a level at which rightness and wrongness
cease to be analytical or comprehensible. When it drops below
that point, it's aberration.

The point you degenerate from survive to succumb is the point you
recognize you are wrong. That is the beginning of succumb. The
moment one becomes worried about his own survival, he enters into
the necessity to dominate in order to survive.

It goes: the insistence upon survival, followed by the necessity
to dominate, followed then by the necessity to be right. These
postulates go downhill. So you get an aberrated rightness or
wrongness. The game of domination consists of making the other
fellow wrong in order to be right.

That is the essence of the service facsimile.

The reason the service facsimile isn't rational is because you
have A=A=A's along the whole line. Coming down the line, it works
itself back and forth in an aberrated A=A=A. If the individual is
surviving, he must be right. And people will defend the most
fantastic wrongnesses on the basis they are being right.

In PT and at any point along the track, the fellow is trying to
be right, trying to be right, trying to be right. Whatever he's
doing, he's trying to be right. In order to survive you have to
be right more than you're wrong, so you get the obsession to be
right in order to survive. The lie is that he can't do anything
else except survive.

It isn't that trying to be right is wrong -- it's obsessively
being right about something that's obviously wrong. That's when
the individual is no longer able to select his own course of
behavior. When he is obsessively following courses of behavior
which are uninspected in order to be right.

There is nothing sane about a service facsimile; there is no
rationality to it. The computation does not fit the incident or
event occurring. It simply enforces, exaggerates and destroys
freedom of choice over the exercise of ability to be happy or
powerful or normal or active. It destroys power, destroys freedom
of choice.

Wherever that zone or area is, you'll see the individual
worsening. He is on a dwindling spiral. But he himself is
generating it.

The intention to be right is the strongest intention in the
universe. Above it you have the effort to dominate and above that
you have the effort to survive. These things are strong. But
we're talking here about a mental activity. A thinking activity.
An intentional activity.

Survival -- that just happens. Domination -- that just happens.
Those are not intended things. But you get down along the level
of intended and it's right or wrong. The strongest intention in
the universe.

It is always an aberrated solution. It always exists in PT and is
part of the environment of the pc. He's generating it. It's his
solution. Overwhelmed as he is by it, he is still generating it.
It's aberrated because it's an uninspected solution. And it is
something that everyone, unintentionally or otherwise, is telling
the pc is wrong and causing him to assert that it is right. The
perfect solution when he first got hold of it. But now it
monitors his life; it's living his life for him. And it doesn't
even vaguely begin to take care of his life.

That is the anatomy of the service facsimile.

You are going to find these on any pc you audit. A service
facsimile is the clue, the key to a pc's case. The route to
succumb which he blindly asserts is his route to survival. And
every pc has more than one of these.

Fortunately, we have the tech to salvage him. We are the only
ones who do.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dr.gm



******************************************************************

31. HCOB    6 Sept 1978 II   Service Facsimiles and Rock Slams

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
                  Issue II

Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses

      SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS

  Refs:
  HCOB 5 Sept. 78            ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
  HCOB 1 Sept. 63            ROUTINE THREE SC
  HCOB 6 Sept. 78 III        ROUTINE THREE SC-A
                             FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE
                             HANDLING UPDATED WITH
                             NEW ERA DIANETICS
  Tape: 6308C27 SH Spec 299  RIGHTNESS AND WRONGNESS
  Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302  HOW TO FIND A SERVICE
                             FACSIMILE
  Tape: 6309C03 SH Spec 302A R3SC
  Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303  SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
  Tape: 6309C18 SH Spec 308  ST. HILL SERVICE FAC HANDLING
  HCOB 3 Sept. 78            DEFINITION OF A ROCK SLAM
  HCOB 10 Aug. 76R           R/Ses, WHAT THEY MEAN

                ----------

A service facsimile is a brother to R/Ses and evil intentions.

This is easily seen when one understands the anatomy of the
service fac and the right/wrong, dominate and survive
computations that enter into it, and when one understands that an
R/S always means a hidden, evil intention and that the total
reason for an R/S is to make wrong. In order to get someone to
succumb, they have to be wrong.

Way back up there, the idea preceding the service fac was right,
really right. Then it came down a bit and was a method of
survival and then it was a method of dominating and then it was a
method of being right in order to make others wrong.

And in that contest one got enough overts so that the
communication line took a switcheroo. What was right about it is
now wrong about it and what was once wrong is now right. A=A=A
enters into the situation where rightness becomes wrongness. All
of his overts get piled up on one of these fixed ideas, or what
we call a service facsimile.

It isn't actually a facsimile at all. It's the guy himself
keeping facsimiles in restimulation because he "knows" what's
best. The person himself is generating the fixed idea; it is not
the bank.

It isn't what aberration the individual is dramatizing. It's what
aberration does the individual dredge up in order to make
somebody wrong. It isn't the accidental thing you think it is.
It's intended.

The intention is to be right and make others wrong, to dominate
others and escape domination oneself, to aid own survival and
hinder the survival of others. That is the service fac -- blood
brother to the hidden, evil intention that is behind the rock
slam.

This does not mean you will necessarily see R/Ses on every
service fac you run. It does mean that WHERE A PC IS R/Sing IN AN
AREA YOU HAVE AN AREA OF A HEAVY -- A SEVERE -- SERVICE FAC.

Know when you see an R/S that the individual is in the grip of an
evil intention which he himself is generating. He intends that
area or subject on which he is R/Sing nothing but harm.
Calculatingly, covertly, he will go to great lengths to carry his
intentions out, at all times carefully concealing the fact.

The evil intention is not limited to terminals. He's not R/Sing
on a terminal; he's R/Sing on the evil intention. The evil
intention can associate with many terminals.

The R/S dominates the individual; it is the person. He has been
overwhelmed by it. In that area he has no ability to reason; he
has no freedom to choose. The evil intention is substituted for
livingness. It is his safe solution to life, his service
facsimile.

The service fac does not respond to ordinary auditing because in
the course of ordinary auditing it does not get inspected. It, by
its nature, forbids inspection. But when addressed at the
right/wrong level, the pc gives it up easily because in that area
he has no power of choice.

     MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC

We have had, for many years, service fac processing with which to
handle these obsessions, and thus to handle the person who R/Ses.

But it is not just finding one service facsimile. You find many
service facs which then add up to the big one. At Saint Hill in
the mid-60s this was commonly associated with R/Ses.

It was what the pc had done with the service fac to make others
wrong which was important, not just finding it. Early on, the
tech included auditing them out with Dianetics. And you found
many, many more than one on each pc. We used to get complete
character changes with this.

The full tech on this has been submerged over the past several
years. It is probably this omission of requiring several service
facs to be run and then auditing them out with Dianetics that has
resulted in so many R/Sers going on up undetected.

As of this writing the full tech has been exhumed and we have now
New Era Dianetics tech to help strip these packages down and take
them apart at their basics.

So we not only have a more thorough means of handling service
facs than ever before, we also have a more reliable route to the
handling of an R/Ser.

BUT IT'S MORE THAN ONE SERVICE FAC PER PC.

You may audit off one, two or three apparent service facsimiles
that all answer up to the complete description of a service fac.
And they will run. But all are actually leaning on the central
service fac that is in restimulation in PT. As you take these
lesser service facs off, the central one comes to view.

On the first ones you find, the most you can hope for is you
found something that blew the TA down and moved you closer to
finding the main service fac. So you take them.

If you've found a service fac, the needle will be looser and the
TA in reasonable range. And it will run on the right/wrong, etc.,
brackets and the pc will get off automaticities. When you've
finally found several and walked it all the way through to the
service fac it's as if all the other service facs you've been
peeling off are like the bands of trees and sod that lie up
against the mountain peak. So you take the service facsimiles and
run them as you find them. You unburden the cliffs before you
pull the mountain out by the roots.

As you're running out the first service facs, you're reversing
the dwindling spiral, you're restoring the individual's ability
to handle his environment because he's now seeing it, he's now
beginning to confront it.

And by the time you've pulled the main one -- the mountain -- out
by its roots, you've returned him to sanity. He is now able to
inspect; he no longer needs a "safe solution."

It is the most dangerous thing in the world to have a safe
solution, because that is the hole out of which sanity drains.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:mf.gm



******************************************************************

32. HCOB    6 Sept 1978 III  Routine Three SC-A
                             Full Service Facsimile Handling
                             Updated with New Era Dianetics

       HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
 Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

     HCO BULLETIN OF 6 SEPTEMBER 1978
                Issue III

Remimeo
Level IV Checksheets
Class IV Auditors
Supervisors
C/Ses

           URGENT--IMPORTANT

           ROUTINE THREE SC-A
  FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING UPDATED
         WITH NEW ERA DIANETICS

  Refs:
  HCOB 22 July 63           YOU CAN BE RIGHT
  HCOB 1 Sept. 63           ROUTINE THREE SC
  HCOB 23 Aug. 66           SERVICE FACSIMILE
  HCOB 30 Nov. 66           ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE
                            FACSIMILES
  Tape: 6309C04 SH Spec 302 HOW TO FIND A SERVICE FACSIMILE
  Tape: 6309C05 SH Spec 303 SERVICE FACSIMILE ASSESSMENT
  Tape: 6308C28 SH Spec 300 THE TA AND SERVICE FAC
  Tape: 6309C12 SH Spec 305 SERVICE FACS
  HCOB 26 June 78 II        NED Series 6
                            ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY
                            CHAINS
  HCOB 18 June 78           NED Series 4
                            ASSESSMENT AND HOW TO GET THE
                            ITEM
  HCOB 5 Sept. 78           ANATOMY OF A SERVICE FACSIMILE
  HCOB 6 Sept. 78 II        SERVICE FACSIMILES AND ROCK SLAMS

               ----------

NOTE: Dianetic Clears may be run on service facs but only with
any Dianetic steps deleted, as they are not to be run on
Dianetics.

               ----------

We are into a new echelon of service facsimile running.

At Saint Hill in the mid-60s many, many service facs were found
on each pc and the earliest service fac running included the use
of Dianetics.

This was later omitted from service fac procedure and service
facs were handled solely with Scientology tech by running off the
automaticities on the computation to cognition, F/N and VGIs in
the pc.

Phenomenal gains and case changes were made on pcs with that tech
alone -- all of them valid. That tech has been retained as a
vital action to service fac handling.

Now, with the advent of New Era Dianetics, service fac handling
has been restored to its full technology.

New Era Dianetics has opened the door to a more complete and
finite handling of a service fac, with precision and exactness,
than we have had heretofore. We no longer just find a service
fac, audit off the automaticities, key it out and forget it. We
audit it out fully and terminatedly, using New Era Dianetics to
take it down to its basics and erase those.

This in no way contradicts the fact that there were many pcs who,
with a service fac found and the automaticities taken off, were
able to actually then blow the service fac computation upon
inspection.

What it does make possible is the actual erasure of a service fac
and its residuals on every pc, one for one. And not just one
service facsimile per pc, but many.

An auditor who has been trained on service fac running prior to
this bulletin will need the tech he already has plus an excellent
command of New Era Dianetics tech. If he has not done the New Era
Dianetics Course, it will be required before attempting to run
Routine 3SC-A. A Class IV Auditor who has already done the New
Era Dianetics Course need only review it in order to be able to
handle all the steps of the new, full service fac procedure.

    SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING REVISED BY STEPS

Before you can run flows on a service facsimile, you must first
find it. You want the pc's service facsimile. You don't find a
service facsimile by listing for it on flows. You find the pc's
service facsimile and run it on the flows.

The sequence is you list for the pc's service fac, find it, run
the automaticities off it; then you run the service fac itself on
R3RA, engram running by chains. It is run to basic and full
Dianetic end phenomena.

You don't leave a service fac until you have taken it apart and
blown it at its very roots.

Then you list for another service fac, using a different listing
question, and handle it fully. And another, and another. A pc can
have many, many service facsimiles. You peel them off until you
find the main service fac at the core of the case. And you handle
that one fully, as you do the others, per the steps above.

Needless to say, you are going to see some remarkable results.

      FULL SERVICE FACSIMILE PROCEDURE

PRELIMINARY STEPS:

0a. Put in the R (reality) factor with the pc, telling him
briefly what is going to be done in the session.

0b. Clear "computation" very thoroughly with the pc. Use the Tech
Dictionary, HCOB 23 Aug. 66, SERVICE FACSIMILE, and any other
reference you feel the pc may need. Have him demo it until you
are certain he fully understands it.

0c. Clear the bracket commands (right/wrong, dominate, survival)
first, using "Birds fly" as a sample service facsimile. Clearing
the bracket commands is done at this point so you will be able to
use these questions immediately when the service fac is found
without putting stops on the pc's first rush of automaticities
coming off.

0d. Then, clear the listing question.

STEPS OF THE PROCEDURE:

A. List and null for the pc's service fac, using the question:

   "In this lifetime, what do you use to make others wrong?"

You want a BD F/N item that is a computation (not a doingness,
beingness or havingness).

When you get it, indicate the item. Then indicate the F/N. Then,
despite the BD F/N, go on to the next step of the handling.

B. Run the service fac found in (A) on the brackets:

   1. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make you right?

   2. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) make others wrong?

   3. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you escape
      domination?

   4. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to
      dominate others?

   5. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?

   6. In this lifetime, how would (service fac) hinder the
      survival of others?

These are run as follows:

Give the pc the first question, "In this lifetime, how would
(service fac) make you right?" and let him run with it. He will
have a rush of answers, answers coming too fast to be said
easily, at this stage. Don't repeat the question unless the pc
needs it. Just let him answer 1-1-1-1-1-1 (he may give you as
many as 50 answers) until he comes to a cognition or runs out of
answers or inadvertently answers question 2.

Then switch to question 2: "In this lifetime how would (service
fac) make others wrong?" Treat this the same way, i.e., let him
answer 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2 until he cognites or runs out of answers
or starts to answer question 1. Then switch back to question 1,
same handling, back to question 2, same handling, as long as pc
has answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N, acknowledge,
indicate the F/N and end off on (1) and (2).

Now give him question 3: "In this lifetime how would (service
fac) help you escape domination?" and let it run by the same
method as above. When this seems cooled off, use question 4: "In
this lifetime, how would (service fac) help you to dominate
others?" Use questions 3 and 4 as above, as long as pc has
answers coming easily. Upon cognition and F/N, acknowledge,
indicate the F/N and go on to the next bracket.

Using the same method as above, give him question 5: "In this
lifetime, how would (service fac) aid your survival?" When he's
run out on 5-5-5-5-5-5, switch to question 6: "In this lifetime,
how would (service fac) hinder the survival of others?" Use
questions 5 and 6 as above as long as pc has answers coming
easily. Let him get off all the automaticities and come to a
cognition and F/N. Acknowledge and indicate the F/N.

At this point it is safe to end off on running the brackets. The
idea is not to beat the process to death. The pc will have
automaticities coming off thick and fast early in the run. These
must be gone and the pc bright, F/Ning and VGIs when you end off.
You are only trying to end the compulsive character of the
service facsimile found and get it off automatic and get the pc
to see it better at this stage, not to bleed the process of every
bit of TA action.

Running the service fac in the brackets will result in a major
cognition, which could occur at any point during this running.
When it does occur, it is the EP of this step of the service fac
handling. End off and go onto the R3RA step.

NOTE: In running a Dianetic Clear on service facs, you would end
off running this service fac at this point, when the pc had
reached a good cognition, F/N and VGIs. Do NOT run the Dianetic
actions of service fac handling on a Dianetic Clear, as these pcs
are not to be run on Dianetics. When you have completed one
service fac on steps A and B, you can then list for another
service fac and repeat the procedure.

NOTE:   If the service fac found on any pc did not run on the
brackets, it would need to be prepchecked. See sections "When
Running Off The Automaticity" and "When To Prepcheck" below.

C. Run the service fac R3RA Quad, each flow to EP. It is not run
narrative and it is not preassessed; otherwise full New Era
Dianetics tech is used, per HCOB 26 June 78R II, NED Series 6,
ROUTINE 3RA, ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS.

The service fac phrase itself is used as the running item.

The commands for running a service fac on R3RA Quad Flows are

   FLOW 1: "Locate a time when you used (service fac)."

   (Example: "Locate a time when you used all horses sleep in
   beds.")

   FLOW 2: "Locate an incident of your causing another to use
           (service fac)."

   FLOW 3: "Locate an incident of others causing others to use
           (service fac)."

   FLOW 0: "Locate an incident of you causing yourself to use
           (service fac)."

Take each flow down its chain of incidents to the basic and full
Dianetic EP: F/N, postulate (postulate off = erasure) and VGIs.

That will be the end of all vestiges of that service fac.

D. List for another service fac on the pc, using the listing
question:

   "In this lifetime, what do you use to dominate others?"

When you have the service fac, repeat steps B and C above.

E. Find another service fac on the pc with the listing question:

   "In this lifetime, what do you use to aid your own survival?"

Handle the service fac per steps B and C above.

F. Continue to find and handle service facs on the pc, using, in
order, the following listing questions:

   1. "In this lifetime, what do you use to make yourself right?"

   2. "In this lifetime, what do you use to escape domination?"

   3. "In this lifetime, what do you use to hinder the survival
      of others?"

Further listing questions which can be used are given on HCOB 30
Nov. 66, ASSESSMENT FOR SERVICE FACSIMILES.

You will need to find and handle several service facsimiles on
the pc which will then add up to the big one.

      WHEN LISTING FOR THE SERVICE FACSIMILE

You are listing for a BD F/N item. Write down each computation
the pc gives you exactly as he states it, VERBATIM, with its
read, no matter how improbable, non sequitur or inane it may
sound.

The service fac operates like a magnet as you're listing. You've
given the pc the question and as the question is in the vicinity
of the service fac you've already ticked it. It draws the pc's
attention to it. He's listing along and suddenly he'll put a non
sequitur item on the list. It doesn't make sense. It doesn't even
answer the question, but there it is. Because his attention is
being pulled to this inevitably. You're asking him for answers
and he gives you the rightest answer he knows -- "People always
jump off the Empire State Building." That's the solution. That
solves everything. It blows the TA down. That's the service fac.

Indicate the item to the pc; then indicate the F/N.

You're now ready to run it in the brackets.

      WHEN RUNNING OFF THE AUTOMATICITY

If you've found a service fac, the pc won't be able to stay out
of it, I guarantee you.

The first question is always how would it make him right. (Never
how would it make him wrong. Never, never, never.) The
automaticities should start with the first question. If not, ask
him how it would make others wrong. You almost always enter it at
the level of right/wrong. But don't make the blunder of thinking
it can't be a service fac if it doesn't enter at that level. Try
it on the other levels. It can enter at the level of dominate; it
might enter at the level of survival.

But if -- on one of those -- the pc doesn't immediately jump in
and swim into the whirlpool, it's not it. If he tells you, "Well,
let's see... make me right, no, hmmmm..." or "...escape
domination... no, doesn't make sense," that's not it.

If he says that isn't it, then that isn't it. Don't hang him with
a wrong service fac because it's too easy to find a right one.
They abound.

If he hasn't jumped in and swum madly to the center of the
whirlpool and gotten embroiled in this thing, it's not it.
Because that's the first thing they want to do with a service fac
-- drown.

When you have the right one, you'll get the automaticities coming
off thick and fast. Don't stop the avalanche with
acknowledgments. Don't stop it with a new question. Let it run
out.

It's not one auditing question for one answer. It's one auditing
question for one waterfall.

            WHEN TO PREPCHECK

When the item found as a service fac won't run on any of the
brackets, you prepcheck it to EP (F/N Cog VGIs). Ref: HCOB 14
Mar. 71R, F/N EVERYTHING.

A rightness/wrongness computation doesn't surrender to normal
auditing because it is a service fac. The pc has a vested
interest in holding onto it. He won't be able to itsa it on a
Prepcheck. Thus, a service fac, if present, will turn on mass on
a Prepcheck.

The Prepcheck is a series of types of decisions thetans make
about things. So if it doesn't prepcheck, the Prepcheck must be
in conflict with the rightness and wrongness.

Reversely, if it's not a service fac, it will prepcheck, and you
polish it off by that method to EP.

Then go back to the list and find a service fac that will run.

     COMPLETING SERVICE FACSIMILE HANDLING WITH R3RA

Even when the pc has gotten off the automaticities, has cognited
and is comparatively free of the compulsive character of the
service facsimile, there is more to be handled.

Running the service fac using R3RA enables him to run out what he
has done with it to make others wrong, etc. These will be the
actual most-charged incidents in which he's used it, which will
have accumulated in his wake as he went along substituting the
service fac for himself and never inspecting the consequences. He
will now be free to inspect those parts of the track as himself,
and to inspect as well the effects of the service fac on the
other flows.

Finally, the use of R3RA, engram running by chains, enables him
to fully erase the somatics and engram chains which have their
roots in the service fac, or vice versa-as well as the postulates
underlying them.

        ENDING SERVICE FAC RUNNING

Service fac running can be ended off when you have fully run many
service facs (which will lead to the main service fac). When the
main service fac has been run to full EP, service fac handling is
complete.

NOTE: It might happen (rarely) that you get the main service fac
on the pc on your first listing and nulling. It will be rare
because the main one does not usually come to view until the
others have been taken off. You run it, of course. Any service
fac, run, produces change, but on this one you will see the pc
changing character before your eyes. The results are quite
astounding.

But realize that he does have other, lesser service facs which do
not simply dissolve because the main core service fac is now
gone, even though they have been leaning upon it. You will need
to L&N for these and completely clean the pc of service facs.

The main core service facsimile will be the one the pc has used
as a solution to all of life. When found and run, it will be
unmistakable to both the pc and the auditor. When this one has
been completed on all the steps above, as well as the lesser
service facs surrounding it, you will have attained the EP on
service fac running.

You will have brought about a complete character change in the
individual, returned his freedom of choice and his freedom to
inspect and enabled him to be truly right.

And that is the stuff of which sanity is made.

This level is actually the sanity level.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

LRH:dr.gm


